January Submission Deadlines

 

CFP: Animalia: University of Alberta Philosophy Graduate and Postgraduate Conference May 8-9, 2020

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Submission Deadline January 5, 2020

 

We invite graduate students and postgraduates to submit papers to this year’s philosophy graduate and postgraduate conference taking place on May 8-9, 2020 at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

This year we will analyze, discuss and criticize the relationships, similarities and differences between humans and non-human animals from historical, scientific, phenomenological and ethical perspectives, among others. Philosophy has historically posited: Animals are property to be used, cannot speak or think, act on impulse and desire alone, live solely in the present, and are unaware of their mortality; humans are free, think and speak with one another, gather to form cities and interact according to ethical principles, can remember and anticipate, and are aware of their mortality. But philosophy has also raised commonalities: We all co-exist as living beings, are embodied, sense, and act and suffer and emote.

We aim to criticize these kinds of claims, to understand how we approach and value the concepts of humanity and animality, and to recognize the practical consequences of such thinking. To accomplish this, we will ask questions such as: Is any metaphysical distinction between humans and animals tenable or justifiable? If so, in what terms? If not, is a pragmatic distinction nevertheless required for the sake of a sustainable, lawful and ethical co-existence? What do we mean by rationality, consciousness and sentience, and to what extent are these cogent grounds for determining moral patiency? Is it right, and does it even make sense, to speak about animals in their generality rather than in their specificity as, say, dolphins or bees, or as wild or domesticated? What is a living body? What role does vegetative life play, peripherally, in our understanding of humanity and animality?

To ensure a rewarding discussion, we strongly encourage submissions from all areas of philosophy and related disciplines. We especially encourage submissions from groups underrepresented in the profession.

 

Keynote Presenters:

  • Dr. David Morris, Department of Philosophy, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada

  • Dr. Ingo Brigandt, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

 

Submission Guidelines: Submissions are to be received no later than January 5th, 2020. Papers should not exceed 3000 words. They should be prepared for anonymous review, include a bibliography, and be attached as a PDF to uofaphilconference@gmail.com. In a separate PDF, please include your name, academic affiliation, e-mail address, paper title, and an abstract of no more than 150 words.

 

For more information, please contact us at uofaphilconference@gmail.com. Exceptionally, accommodations may be available to presenters at the conference.

 

 

CFP: Canadian Society for the Study of Practical Ethics (CSSPE) 2020 Annual Conference

Bridging Divides: Confronting Colonialism and Anti-Black Racism May 31 – June 2, 2020

University of Western Ontario (UWO) London, Ontario, Canada Submission Deadline: January 15, 2020

We invite submissions for papers and presentations on any topic in applied ethics and applied politics, broadly understood.

Abstracts should be no more than 300 words, prepared for anonymous review, and are due by January 15, 2020.

Please send your abstract to conference@csspe.ca

Students are eligible for the Don MacNiven Student Essay Prize. If your abstract is selected for the conference, a paper suitable for a 20 minute presentation must be submitted along with proof of student status by April 1, 2020 to be eligible for the prize.

__________________________________________

To learn more about the CSSPE, please visit http://www.csspe.ca/
Join our Facebook Group for future updates: https://www.facebook.com/groups/264056407325493/

 

CFP: 9th Annual University of Calgary Philosophy Graduate Conference

Trusting Relationships between Science and the Public: Locating Problems and Generating Solutions, ( April 30 – May 1, 2020)   Submission deadline January 30, 2020

 

The central question of this conference will be “How can we constructively criticize science from a variety of perspectives, without further damaging public trust in science?”

Paper topics may include but are not limited to:

·         general philosophy of science

·         trust and criticism of science

·         feminist philosophy of science

·         indigenous criticisms of science

·         intersectional criticisms of science

·         social epistemology

·         environmental ethics

Keynote: Naomi Scheman (Minnesota)

Submissions of papers of up to 3000 words (not including abstract or bibliography, but including footnotes/endnotes), prepared for blind review and suitable for a 20-minute presentation should be submitted to: https://easychair.org/cfp/ucpgsa9

 

Organizers especially encourage submissions from members of marginalized groups. All speakers are invited to a conference dinner and any other social activities planned by conference organizers.

 

February Submission Deadlines

 

CFP: Ecofeminism In/And The Anthropocene - European Consortium for Political Research General Conference

University of Innsbruck, 26 – 28 August 2020 Submission deadline: 1 February 2020 

Phillips and Rumens’s recent collection Contemporary Perspectives on Ecofeminism opens with the striking assertion that we need ecofeminism “now more than ever”. And it is not difficult to see why. In an era when human behaviours impact on important biogeochemical conditions so profoundly that the expert Working Group of the Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy recommend acknowledging an epochal shift, the so-called ‘Anthropocene’ provides an opportunity to rethink the relationships between our practical and theoretical commitments, and the requirement for effective environmental activism. Moreover, specifically ecofeminist responses to the Anthropocene’s emblematic conditions offer particular promise for our task by diagnosing problematic (e.g., androcentric, utilitarian, and dualistic) metatheoretical assumptions implicit in the ways that scientists, activists and philosophers characterise the Anthropocene – often problematizing the ‘Anthropocene’ term itself – and proposed 'solutions' to it. However, therein lies the rub.

 

Despite the resurgence of interest in ecofeminism, insofar as ecofeminism is best considered a metatheoretical or critical endeavour, two strands of criticism continue to haunt it. The first concerns the practical contribution that ecofeminism has made and might make to environmental politics and activism in a time of mass species extinction and rapid anthropogenic climate change. Its impressive track record of identifying the gender inequalities plausibly perpetuated by well-meaning political measures such as the Paris Climate Accord notwithstanding, for instance, what can ecofeminism offer in terms of positive practice or policy-led proposals in a crisis context which appears to offer the urgent injunction to ‘act now!’? The second strand concerns the value and penetration of the kind of critique available to ecofeminists. Concerns persist about ecofeminism’s alleged essentialism (strategic or otherwise) and its ability to commit to truly intersectional analysis, for instance, as do concerns about ecofeminism’s ability to maintain an intelligible identity in light of the multifaceted theoretical modifications that ecofeminists have employed in light of these objections. This panel intends address these issues by bringing together political theorists, philosophers, and activists who share our intuition that ecofeminism is important in the context of the so-called Anthropocene and global flourishing more broadly, and who wish to further explore that hunch.


Section: Environmental Politics

Paper submission:

Please email the panel chairs by 1 February 2020 with the following:

·     Paper title

·     Abstract (max 500 words)

·     Author(s) name(s) and institution(s)

Chair: Robert Booth (University of Liverpool) robert.booth@liverpool.ac.uk 

Co-chair: Andy Holland (University of Liverpool) holland@liverpool.ac.uk 

 

CFA: Graduate and Undergraduate Conference: Critical Reflections on the Environment and Nature

University of Windsor, March 27, 2020 - March 28, 2020 Submission deadline: February 14

 

All undergraduate and graduate students interested in participating are invited to submit a 250-400 word abstract for a 10-12 page paper (suitable for a 20 minute presentation). Presentations will be followed by a 10 minute question and answer period. While submissions from any area of philosophy are welcome, topics related to the environment, animals, and nature will be given special consideration.

Following the conference a keynote address will be given by:

STEVEN VOGEL

Author of Thinking Like a Mall

 

Abstracts will be chosen by blind review. All submissions should include the name of applicant, the level of study and the institution they are associated with. The deadline for submissions is February 14, 2020. Notice of acceptance can be expected within a few days after the deadline. Please submit all abstracts to our conference website: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/essaysofsignificance/

CALL FOR PROPOSALS: International Association for Environmental Philosophy (IAEP) 24th Annual Meeting (10–12 October 2020) Toronto, ON (Following the 59th Annual Meeting of the Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (SPEP))

Submission Deadline: 15 FEBRUARY 2020.

 

IAEP offers a forum for the philosophical discussion of our relation to the environment. We embrace a broad understanding of environmental philosophy including its affinities with other disciplines in the environmental humanities.  We welcome diverse philosophical approaches, including philosophical work inspired by Continental philosophy, the history of philosophy, and American philosophy, as well as theoretically robust engagements with other disciplines or with environmental politics or activism.

 

IAEP welcomes papers and panels in the following areas:

• environmental philosophy, environmental ethics, environmental aesthetics, ontology, philosophy of nature, etc.

• environmental political theory, environmental justice, postdevelopment/postcolonial theories, etc.

• environment and disability, ecofeminism, queer ecologies, indigeneity, race and environment, etc.

• environment and culture, ecocriticism, environment and affect, urban ecology, environment and technology, philosophy of architecture, environmental art and activism, environment and religion, etc.

• critical animal studies, animal ethics, animal rights theory, 

Individual Paper proposals: Please send a single-spaced Word document (prepared for blind review) including a proposal (500-600 words) PLUS a short abstract (75-100 words, for the conference program). The body of the email should include detailed contact information (including physical and electronic addresses), academic affiliation(s) of the author(s) AND whether you will require A/V equipment. (We cannot guarantee A/V equipment without this indication at the time of submission.) Panel proposals (max. 3 papers): Please send one single-spaced Word document (prepared for blind review) including a title and a 350 – 500 word abstract for the panel followed by titles, proposals and short abstracts for each paper as described above. The body of the email should include contact information and affiliations for each author, plus an indication of whether A/V equipment is required. Paper proposals will also be judged individually and may be accepted individually without acceptance of the entire panel.

ALL SUBMISSIONS and ENQUIRIES should be sent to iaepsecretary@gmail.com.

Authors may submit only one proposal for consideration. Papers previously published or under review for publication will not be accepted. Accepted authors must be members of IAEP and registered for the conference by 1 September 2020 or they will be removed from the program.

$250 PRIZE FOR BEST STUDENT ESSAY: Students, please indicate in your email if you wish to be considered for this prize. If your proposal is accepted you will be asked for a complete paper (3000 words maximum, excluding notes) by 1 September. The winner will be announced during the conference.

DEADLINE: 15 FEBRUARY 2020. NOTICE OF DECISION: MID-MAY 2020. Information about IAEP and membership is available at www.environmentalphilosophy.org.

 

CFA Memorial University of Newfoundland Graduate Philosophy Conference: Evil, Guilt, and Forgiveness

(May 1–3, 2020) -- Submission Deadline: February 15

 

Keynote Speaker: Dr. Gaëlle Fiasse (McGill University)

 

Priority will be given to abstracts that consider evil, guilt, and/or forgiveness, although abstracts on any philosophical topic will be considered. Possible paper topics include, but are not limited to:

 

·      The metaphysics of evil

·      Platonic and Neoplatonic treatments of evil

·      Modern and contemporary treatments of evil (e.g., Leibniz, Kant, Arendt)

·      The (im)possibility of forgiveness

·      The relationship between individual and collective guilt

·      The failure of theodicies

·      The phenomenology of forgiveness

·      Narrative healing

·      Memory, trauma, and mourning

·      Environmental destruction and inhumane treatment of animals

·      Racism, slavery, and colonialism

·      War and genocide

 

Please send abstracts of no more than 500 words no later than February 15th, 2020 to Jordan van den Hoonaard: jvdh83@mun.ca. Speakers will be allotted 20 minutes for presentations followed by 10 minutes of discussion. Please include your name, paper title, and institutional affiliation in your email. Remove all identifying information from your abstract. Applicants will be notified of the results of the review process by March 7th, 2020.

CFA: Special Issue on Women in Movement and Feminisms: Critical Materialisms & Environmentalisms, 

Studies in Social Justice  Submission deadline: 28 February

 

Guest editors: Renata Campos Motta and Marcela Suarez Estrada

 

As an example of a global model of devastating accumulation, Latin America presents extreme situations that challenge feminisms to rethink the very feasibility of nature, matter and life itself. Governments of both the left and the right in the region have opted for a model of extractive development based on the over-exploitation of communities and the environment (Arsel 2013; Schilling-Vacaflor 2017). Processes of migration (or expulsion) linked to poverty and violence have been exacerbated by the effects of climate change and environmental destruction. Furthermore, to the limited efforts of democratization and consolidation of redistributive policies is added the growing expansion of religious fundamentalisms as extreme forms of the cultural expression of a hegemonic neoliberal development model. In light of this onslaught on life itself, whose effects reverberate unequally and harm the most vulnerable populations, old and emerging anti-capitalist feminist struggles in the regionpresent new directions to rethink core elements of emancipatory politics under the current configurations of global entangled inequalities (Jelin, Motta, and Costa 2017).

In this context, there has been an increasing interest in turning to debates on critical materialisms to understand feminist struggles in the region, and to link body politics to diverse forms of labour and its exploitation, looking at various scales, such as communities, subaltern territorialities and various ecologies. Second, these feminist struggles appear to be increasingly intertwined with ecological ones. Third, and related to this, feminist movements also appear to be engaging in cross-movement alliances with non-feminist others, which are mutually beneficial (Conway 2017). Feminists are expanding their core agenda in directions such as environmentalism and food sovereignty, while also trying to sensitize other movements to feminist issues (Masson, Paulos, and Beaulieu Bastien 2017; Conway 2018). Fourth, situated knowledges, practices, and mobilizations in Latin America have revealed the diversity of feminisms in the region, rendering visible the intersections not only of race, ethnicity, class, gender and sexual orientation, but also of categories of difference that inform important intersections such as nationality and spatialities – such as the diverse forms of rurality - that remain under-conceptualized. These account for the multiple global processes that result in specific forms of entangled inequalities in rural areas. These power relationships are best understood by combining discourses and material practices, inquiring into the role that these play in both the domination of bodies and nature, but also in their strategies of resistance in the rural context.

In this special issue, we wish to engage in a discussion on the possible contributions of a renewed critical materialism to feminist knowledge and struggles through an interdisciplinary dialogue and through the recounting of particular experiences of resistance to rural inequalities and processes in the region. We ask what a rereading of critical feminist materialism, situated in this moment of abysmal crisis, can offer?What are the new dimensions of politics, agency and difference? Are there openings, nuances, and opportunities for new thinking, acting and resisting in rural spaces? We suggest compiling articles that will address these questions and at least one of the following research problems.

First, we would like to call for contributions that incorporate the multiple relations of ruling (Mohanty 2003; Smith 1987)including power over bodies and environments. Debates on critical and new materialisms appear against this background as a helpful tool to analyze, understand and decry the injustices suffered by women*. We welcome papers that pay a renewed attention to the materialist approach centered on understanding capitalism not only as an economic system, but as a civilizational project with powerful social, gendered, colonial and ecological dimensions. In order to do so, we suggest that papers engage in a dialogue between critical materialism and the feminist analytics of intersectionality. This feminist contribution to discuss the multiple dimensions of inequalities originally called attention to the specific situation of black women within feminist struggles and antiracist struggles in the US (Crenshaw 1991)and is now deployed to critically invite the consideration of how inequalities are entangled and other dimensions should be also taken into account in new feminist materialism.

Secondly, the potential papers should incorporate the contribution of feminist epistemologies, including the commitment to recognize knowledge production as situated knowledge (Haraway 1991)that broadens the conception of materialism. The category “woman” should not be understood as an essentializing or universalizing unity nor as a mere ontological category. Rather, the situatedness in question is to be traced back to her location. The materiality of her experience has direct consequences on their theories and conceptions. This implies not only that knowledge production must take into account the context of the researcher, but also the need to make connections between differently situated struggles. In order words, a feminist science is committed to certain values, namely that of emancipation vis-a-vis relations of domination of gender, race, colonialism (Harding 1991). In this sense, it is necessary to inquire into how theories and concepts used to analyse agricultural food systems are embedded in eurocentrism and do not allow knowledge production from subaltern positions. For instance,“subsistence” is related to indigenous or peasant societies, making reference to pre-capitalist production systems but also to racist-colonial power constellations based on Eurocentrism. The concept has been prescribed since modernity as a pre-industrial societal characteristic; as “natural” and pre-modern.

Third, we wish to enquire into ways of conceptualizing and researching topics that lie at the intersections between feminist and environmentalist agendas. Feminist scholarship has often followed feminist praxis. Here, the concept of social reproduction is an important contribution of feminist agendas to social theories and social movements, including for the understanding of agrarian movements. Critical agrarian studies can learn not only from agrarian movements in theorizing domination and resistance, but also from feminism. Feminist political ecology is situated at the intersection of three theoretic strands. It avails itself of a classic Marxist perspective to consider the political-economic aspect, looks at feminist ecologies through the lens of post-structuralism, and turns to the debate of new materialisms, enquiring into the bodily experience of eating. At this intersection, food sovereignty can be theorized as an everyday resistance, against the background of globalizing neoliberalism. Food politics is a topic in which the combination of feminist and critical agrarian studies appears to provide the greatest insight.

Lastly, environmental issues, global dynamics of entangled inequalities affecting rural areas and their struggles seem to have grounded a profound link between a broad spectrum of social movements and materiality evident in feminist collective action and new means of embodiment. The relevance of analyzing these coalitions, co-operations and independent work focused on the shared goal of preserving and protecting the environment and creating feminist strategies of resistance, is evident against the background of movements. The question of the construction of coalitions is a very ambiguous one, especially considering the wide range of kinds of cooperation, let alone understanding how a collective action is established, and how different movements produce knowledge, conceive and relate to matter in new ways, thus offering a broader view of embodiments and body politics.

If you are interested in contributing to the special issue “Women in Movement and Feminisms: critical materialisms and environmentalisms”, please send your abstract to the guest editors at renata.motta@fu-berlin.deand marcela.suarez@fu-berlin.deby February 28, 2020. Submitted abstracts should not exceed 500 words excluding references. Length and other formatting issues for the ultimate versions of the papers will follow SSJ guidelines.

In case your abstract is accepted we will work according to the following plan:

Activity

Deadline: Call for abstracts: 28 February 2020

Decision on abstracts: 15 March 2020

First drafts: 1 September 2020

Editors comments to authors and possible workshop: 16 October 2020

Revised drafts for external review: 10 February 2021

Comments Returned: 10 May 2021

Final Version to editors: 30 August 2021

Revision and final submission: 15 September 2021

March Submission Deadlines

 

CFP: Vancouver Summer Philosophy Conference, Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia

DEADLINE TO SUBMIT OR VOLUNTEER: MARCH 1, 2020
The 2020 VSPC will be August 23–August 27. (Please note that these dates have changed)

 

The VSPC is different from many conferences in important ways. Conference attendance is limited to those on the program, the organizers and referees, and members of the UBC philosophy department. This is due to funding and logistical constraints, together with the fact that the VSPC is a workshop-style conference that involves in-depth discussions of works-in-progress.

There are four ways to participate in the VSPC: (1) have your paper selected for the program; (2) be a chair or commentator; (3) referee; (4) be part of the host department. The first three require submitting the form below by March 1. Everyone in the world is invited to submit a paper and/or volunteer to be a commentator, session chair, or program referee.

 

TO SUBMIT A PAPER
Papers must be submitted in PDF format, and prepared for anonymous review. Please include an abstract and a word count (including notes; excluding the bibliography) on the first page of the paper.

Papers on any topic in philosophy are welcome. (And "philosophy" is broadly construed!) Note however that the organizers will be looking for papers that will be of interest to all VSPC participants, so papers of broad philosophical interest that do not require specialized expertise to understand or appreciate are strongly preferred.

The strict word limit is 10,000 words, but shorter papers (under 7500 words) have a better chance of being accepted. (We are asking all participants to pre-read all nine papers, so a longer paper is more work for everyone. This can be justified, but it needs to be justified.)

 

The VSPC is a workshop-style conference: papers on the program are read in advance by all conference participants, whose feedback is intended to be used in improving the paper. For this reason, please do not submit published work, or work for which you wouldn't have a chance to incorporate feedback from the VSPC in any subsequent published version.

All participants, including authors, are expected to read all of the papers in advance, to attend all of the sessions, and to come prepared for discussion.

 

When you are ready to submit, there are two steps.
Step 1: complete the form below
Step 2: email your paper (pdf attachment) to thevspc@gmail.com

The deadline for submissions is the end of the day (Pacific Time) on March 1, 2020. Authors will be notified of the organizers' decisions by mid-April.

 

TO VOLUNTEER

The other way to apply for the VSPC is by volunteering. We welcome volunteers who would like to referee, chair, and/or comment. Please use the form you can find at https://www.thevspc.com/cfp. You do not have to submit a paper to volunteer. If you submit a paper, you won't be able to referee right away due to the conflict of interest, though if your paper is not selected we may still ask for your assistance with refereeing in later rounds. Volunteer referees should be willing and able to read 5-6 papers in their areas of expertise between March 15 and March 31, and send us brief reports on each.

For additional general information, contact the organizers: https://philpeople.org/profiles/jonathan-jenkins-ichikawa

 

CFA: Memorial University of Newfoundland Graduate Philosophy Conference: Evil, Guilt, and Forgiveness, Department of Philosophy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada 

Submission deadline: March 7

The Department of Philosophy at Memorial University of Newfoundland is hosting a graduate conference entitled Evil, Guilt, and Forgiveness from May 1st to 3rd, 2020.

 

Priority will be given to abstracts that consider evil, guilt, and/or forgiveness, although abstracts on any philosophical topic will be considered. Possible paper topics include, but are not limited to:

 

  • The metaphysics of evil

  • Platonic and Neoplatonic treatments of evil

  • Modern and contemporary treatments of evil (e.g., Leibniz, Kant, Arendt)

  • The im/possibility of forgiveness

  • The relationship between individual and collective guilt

  • The failure of theodicies

  • The phenomenology of forgiveness

  • Narrative healing

  • Memory, trauma, and mourning

  • Environmental destruction and inhumane treatment of animals

  • Racism, slavery, and colonialism

  • War and genocide 

Please send abstracts of no more than 500 words no later than February 15th, 2020 to Jordan van den Hoonaard: jvdh83@mun.ca. Speakers will be allotted 20 minutes for presentations followed by 10 minutes of discussion. Please include your name, paper title, and institutional affiliation in your email. Remove all identifying information from your abstract. Applicants will be notified of the results of the review process by March 7th, 2020. 

 

 

CFP: "Towards Climate Justice. Eco-Strategies for Survival” The Polish Journal of Aesthetics No. 58 (3/2020) Submission deadline: March 31

Editors: Thomas Dutoit (University of Lille, France), Aleksander Kopka (Jagiellonian University, Poland), Katarzyna Szopa (University of Silesia, Poland)

Now that the perspective of climate catastrophe is looming ever closer we are urged to think of the climate change radically and decisively. This demand however does not impose on us a mere change of climate in our social and political relations, but first and foremost, a radical change in perception, laws, and politics that should bear witness and respond to the environmental crisis and the loss of lives (across the multiple borders between vegetal, animal, and human). This compels us not only to rethink notions of pace, action, and practice in terms of what should inevitably become the eco-politics, but also of invention and implementation of political and juridical solutions that would no longer be compelled to render a justice essentially determined by its anthropocentric and capitalistic presuppositions. In fact, such a justice would be nothing more than a betrayal of justice.

And since, as Jacques Derrida argues, justice has always to address the unrecognized other, we should therefore focus on the eco-political situation of those lives (vegetal, animal, and human) deprived of their ‘rights’ (the term however may be anthropocentric), and place whose survival not only is inextricable from our own but should also become the most pressing ethical task. By “survival” however  we do not mean a primitive striving of some privileged homogeneous group to immunize its life at the cost of the others, but rather  affirmation of mortality and vulnerability of the other, and therefore of responsibility for the other.

We would like to examine how this environmental injunction should affect and transform the dominant philosophical and political concepts of community, democracy, property, and rights, but also, if it could serve as an impulse to a thorough critique of capitalocene, the epoch of massive exhaustion and extermination of the natural reserves. We are therefore open to eco-political strategies that represent a wide range of perspectives like ecofeminism, eco-marxism, deconstruction, biopolitics, postcolonial ecocriticism, environmental studies, environmental art, philosophy, literature, etc. What is more, we are interested how the work of contemporary thinkers can serve as instruments of shaping a just culture respectful of all underprivileged and endangered lives.

We invite Authors from various research areas to submit articles concerning the topic of ecology, climate crisis, and environmental humanities, or related to the following questions:

·       environmental migrations: the question of climate migrants and refugees

·       (dis)united Europe and its role in the infinite task of environmental protection

·       inheriting and sharing the unshareable Earth in contrast to the politics of appropriation and capitalistic exploitation

·       eco-critique of technological development

  • ecosystem as the new political community

·       ecological economy and sexual/sexuate difference

·       eco-critique in the perspective of postcolonial studies

·       non-human labour and zoo-proletariat

·       ecology and theory of common goods

·       ecological deployment of feminist theories and actions against new forms of capitalist accumulation

militant art as eco-political activism
political consequences of anthropocentric portrayal of vegetal and animal life.

 

We accept submissions written only in English.

        *********************************************************************

We would like to kindly ask all Authors to familiarize themselves with our guidelines, available under “For Authors” (http://pjaesthetics.uj.edu.pl/pja/do_autorow_ang.php) and to double-check the completeness of each article (including an abstract, keywords, a bibliography, and a note on the author) before submission.

Only completed papers should be submitted using the submissions page, which can be found here: http://submission.pjaesthetics.uj.edu.pl/zglos/index.php

All articles are subjected to double-blind reviews. Articles published in The Polish Journal of Aesthetics are assigned DOI numbers. Please do not hesitate to contact us via email: pjaestheticsuj@gmail.com.

The Polish Journal of Aesthetics is a philosophical-aesthetic periodical, which has been published quarterly since 2001 by the Institute of Philosophy of the Jagiellonian University in Cracow, Poland. The journal has a long editorial tradition and is affiliated with one of the oldest European universities; simultaneously, it continuously grows through systematic development. The editors’ goal is to implement and maintain the highest international publishing standards and practices, resulting in the publication of eminently substantive articles and papers addressing important and topical issues concerning artistic performances and activities. Each year, four volumes of the journal are published devoted to specific issues of aesthetics and philosophy of art, prepared in co-operation with experts of a particular subject.

Please visit our website at: http://pjaesthetics.uj.edu.pl/

Get social with us!
  • Facebook Clean Grey
  • Twitter Clean Grey
  • LinkedIn Clean Grey
Share your thoughts!

 

​Email : csepscpe@ualberta.ca

​​​

© 2016 by CSEP/SCPE. Proudly created with Wix.com

This site was designed with the
.com
website builder. Create your website today.
Start Now